Regulation B and BSA/AML: Navigating Proposed and Final Changes with Confidence
Regulatory change is once again shifting the path forward for financial institutions. From fair lending and small business reporting to Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)/anti-money laundering (AML) modernization, recent and proposed updates are creating a new compliance environment — one that calls for stronger governance, clearer documentation and a more strategic approach to risk management.
For banks and credit unions, the message is clear: compliance cannot be treated as a static checklist. Institutions must be ready to explain not only what their policies say, but how decisions are made, how risks are monitored and how leadership is engaged in the process.
Key Takeaways
One of the most significant changes comes from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CRPB) April 2026 amendments to Regulation B. The final rule eliminates disparate impact liability under Regulation B and significantly narrows what constitutes unlawful discouragement. The framework now places greater emphasis on intentional discrimination rather than statistical outcomes alone.
That shift does not mean fair lending analytics should be set aside. Instead, institutions should use data as an early-warning tool and pair it with stronger file review, control evaluation, governance and decision-level documentation. Underwriting, pricing, exceptions and second-review decisions should be documented in a way that supports a clear, defensible narrative.
The revised discouragement standard also puts renewed focus on direct customer communications. Because the rule centers on oral, written or visual communications that could reasonably discourage someone from applying for credit, frontline training, scripting controls and oversight of applicant interactions remain critical.
Special Purpose Credit Programs should also be reviewed carefully. The rule introduces tighter documentation expectations and, for certain lenders, restrictions on the use of protected characteristics as eligibility criteria. Institutions should revisit written plans, confirm the purpose and need for each program, and document why neutral alternatives would not achieve the same objectives.
Section 1071 small business lending reporting is another area where early preparation matters. The CFPB’s 2026 final rule narrows the original framework by raising the covered transaction threshold to 1,000 annually and reducing the small business revenue definition to $1 million or less. While the Jan. 1, 2028 compliance date provides additional time, institutions should not wait to begin assessing product coverage, exclusions, data fields, system capabilities and accountability structures.
2027 Credit Union Compliance Symposium
Looking Ahead
At the same time, FinCEN’s proposed BSA/AML reforms point to a broader philosophical shift: moving from technical compliance toward risk-based program effectiveness. If finalized, the reforms would require institutions to demonstrate AML programs are not only documented, but effective in identifying, monitoring and mitigating real risk.
This means risk assessments, monitoring systems, staffing, Suspicious Activity Report processes, beneficial ownership procedures and escalation protocols should align with the institution’s specific risk profile. Examiners may increasingly focus on whether controls are reasonable, risk-based and supported by meaningful outcomes, not simply whether they exist.
Across these regulatory developments, one theme stands out: institutions that prepare early will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty with clarity and confidence. Board members and senior management should be brought into planning now, not after implementation pressure builds. Policies and procedures should be refreshed, documentation gaps should be addressed, monitoring should be strengthened and compliance teams should maintain flexibility as expectations continue to evolve.
How We Can Help
Ready to move forward with greater confidence? Connect with Doeren Mayhew’s Financial Institutions Group to discuss how these regulatory changes may impact your institution and what steps to prioritize next.