Tech Company Exit
Viewpoints

3 Early Missteps That Can Undermine a Tech Company Exit

  • Article

For most businesses, preparing for a successful exit requires thoughtful planning well before a potential buyer enters the picture. In the technology sector, where companies often scale rapidly and move from startup to transaction on an accelerated timeline, this preparation is especially critical. With limited cash-flow in their early stages, these companies often prioritize development and growth while overlooking strategic measures like tax planning. However, these early decisions frequently surface later in the tech business lifecycle. Here are three early missteps tech companies often make that can significantly impact their eventual exit. 

Failing to Address Sales Tax Exposure 

Since many tech companies don’t generate meaningful taxable income during early and growth stages, they often develop a false sense of security around potential tax exposure. As these companies scale across state lines and into global markets, they can create significant exposure driven by nexus and multistate compliance requirements. Because tax planning is rarely a priority in the early stages, such issues are commonly deferred until the due diligence stage, resulting in costly fees, delayed timelines and potential purchase price adjustments. Taking a proactive approach by engaging a state and local tax (SALT) team early on can mitigate risk, surprises and costs at the closing table.   

Cutting Corners on Equity Compensation 

In the startup environment, equity compensation is a common tool used to attract and retain talent in lieu of higher salaries or more stable compensation. The problem arises when employers cut corners in issuing these grants, particularly as it relates to company valuation and tax compliance. Granting equity at an undervalued price, and the resulting potential tax exposure, can create scrutiny in the due diligence phase. Taking the time to properly structure and support equity grants up front helps avoid these pitfalls and positions the company more favorably in a transaction. 

Overlooking Stock and Trust Strategies 

The Qualified Small Business Stock Exemption (QSBS) has long been a valuable tax savings strategy for tech companies, but recent changes under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) significantly expanded its potential. The law increases the capital gains exclusion from $10 million to $15 million and, for the first time ever, allows for partial exclusions without requiring a full five-year holding period. Under the updated rules, shareholders can benefit from 50% of the gain after three years (up to $7.5 million) or 75% after four years (up to $11.5 million), making QSBS benefits more accessible for companies on a faster exit path.  

Despite these advantages, many companies fail to plan early enough to fully capitalize on these opportunities. In particular, structuring ownership through trusts (“trust stacking”) can allow multiple taxpayers to take advantage of separate QSBS exclusions, significantly increasing the total tax benefit. Without proactive planning around stock issuance, entity structure and trust strategy, companies risk leaving substantial value on the table at exit. 

Plan to Avoid Pitfalls 

Avoiding these common missteps starts with early, proactive planning. Our technology industry specialists are here to help you address these areas and reduce risk, preserve value and position your organization for a smoother and more successful business lifecycle, no matter your stage.  

Ready to put this brain power to work?

Contact Our Pros

Jim Leutenegger Headshot
Jim Leutenegger
Connect with Me

With over 25 years of experience, Jim has a robust background delivering tax compliance and consulting solutions to guide small-to-mid-sized companies towards growth, domestically and abroad. 

Subscribe for more VIEWPoints